An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on [ax-13]. See equsexvw and equsexv for versions with disjoint variable conditions proved from fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsal. See equsexALT for an alternate proof. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)