Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. See spimew and spimevw for weaker versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on [ax-13]. Use spimefv instead. (New usage is discouraged.)