This theorem "defines" negation in terms of 'nand'. Analogous to
nannot. In a pure (standalone) treatment of Nicod's axiom, this
theorem would be changed to a definition ($a statement). (Contributed by
NM, 11-Dec-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
\( \vdash ((\varphi \barwedge \varphi) \barwedge \neg \varphi) \barwedge (((\varphi \barwedge \varphi) \barwedge (\varphi \barwedge \varphi)) \barwedge (\neg \varphi \barwedge \neg \varphi)) \)
\( \vdash \varphi \barwedge \varphi \leftrightarrow \neg \varphi \leftrightarrow ((\varphi \barwedge \varphi) \barwedge \neg \varphi) \barwedge (((\varphi \barwedge \varphi) \barwedge (\varphi \barwedge \varphi)) \barwedge (\neg \varphi \barwedge \neg \varphi)) \)