Theorem eximal

An equivalence between an implication with an existentially quantified antecedent and an implication with a universally quantified consequent. An interesting case is when the same formula is substituted for both \( \varphi \) and \( \psi \), since then both implications express a type of nonfreeness. See also alimex. (Contributed by BJ, 12-May-2019.)

Conclusion
\( \vdash \exists x \, \varphi \rightarrow \psi \leftrightarrow \neg \psi \rightarrow \forall x \, \neg \varphi \)
Proof
df-ex
l1
imbi1i _
\( \vdash \exists x \, \varphi \rightarrow \psi \leftrightarrow \neg \forall x \, \neg \varphi \rightarrow \psi \)
con1b
\( \vdash \neg \forall x \, \neg \varphi \rightarrow \psi \leftrightarrow \neg \psi \rightarrow \forall x \, \neg \varphi \)
bitri l1 _